2025濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣鎴f閺嬩線鏌涘☉姗堟敾闁告瑥绻橀弻鐔虹磼閵忕姵鐏嶉梺绋块椤︻垶鈥﹂崸妤佸殝闂傚牊绋戦~宀€绱撴担鍝勭彙闁搞儜鍜佸晣闂佽瀛╃粙鎺曟懌闁诲繐娴氶崢濂告箒濠电姴锕ら幊搴㈢閹灔搴ㄥ炊瑜濋煬顒€鈹戦垾宕囧煟鐎规洜鍠栭、姗€鎮欏顔锯偓鎾⒒閸屾瑧顦﹂柟璇х節閹兘濡疯瀹曞弶鎱ㄥ璇蹭壕閻庢鍠栭…鐑藉极閹邦厼绶炲┑鐘插閸氬懘姊绘担鐟邦嚋缂佽鍊歌灋妞ゆ挾鍊e☉銏犵妞ゆ挾濮烽敍婊堟⒑缂佹ê濮﹂柛鎾寸懇瀹曟繈濡堕崱娆戭啎缂佺虎鍙冮ˉ鎾跺姬閳ь剟鎮楀▓鍨灈妞ゎ厾鍏橀獮鍐閵堝懎绐涙繝鐢靛Т鐎氼喛鍊撮梻鍌氬€风粈渚€骞夐敓鐘茬闁糕剝绋戝婵囥亜閺冨倻鎽傞柛鐔锋噽缁辨捇宕掑顑藉亾閹间礁纾归柣鎴eГ閸ゅ嫰鏌ら幖浣规锭闁搞劍姊归妵鍕箻閸楃偟浠奸梺鎼炲妼閸婂潡寮诲☉銏╂晝闁挎繂妫涢ˇ銉╂⒑閽樺鏆熼柛鐘崇墵瀵寮撮悢铏诡啎闂佺粯鍔﹂崜姘舵偟閺囥垺鈷戠紒瀣儥閸庡繑淇婇锝囩疄鐎殿喛顕ч埥澶婎潩椤愶絽濯伴梻浣告啞閹稿棝鍩€椤掆偓鍗遍柛顐g箥濞撳鏌曢崼婵囧殗闁绘稒绮撻弻鐔煎礄閵堝棗顏�4闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閹冣挃闁硅櫕鎹囬垾鏃堝礃椤忎礁浜鹃柨婵嗙凹缁ㄥジ鏌熼惂鍝ョМ闁哄矉缍侀、姗€鎮欓幖顓燁棧闂備線娼уΛ娆戞暜閹烘缍栨繝闈涱儐閺呮煡鏌涘☉鍗炲妞ゃ儲鑹鹃埞鎴炲箠闁稿﹥顨嗛幈銊╂倻閽樺锛涢梺缁樺姉閸庛倝宕戠€n喗鐓熸俊顖濆吹濠€浠嬫煃瑜滈崗娑氭濮橆剦鍤曢柟缁㈠枛椤懘鏌嶉埡浣告殲闁绘繃娲熷缁樻媴閽樺-鎾绘煥濮橆厹浜滈柨鏃囶嚙閺嬨倗绱掓潏銊︻棃鐎殿喗鎸虫慨鈧柍閿亾闁归绮换娑欐綇閸撗呅氬┑鐐叉嫅缁插潡寮灏栨闁靛骏绱曢崢閬嶆⒑閸濆嫬鏆婇柛瀣尰缁绘盯鎳犻鈧弸娑㈡煟濞戝崬娅嶇€殿喕绮欓、妯款槼闁哄懏绻堝娲濞戞艾顣哄┑鐐额嚋缁茶法鍒掗鐔风窞濠电姴瀛╃€靛矂姊洪棃娑氬婵☆偅绋掗弲鍫曟焼瀹ュ棛鍘遍柣搴秵閸撴瑦绂掗柆宥嗙厵妞ゆ洖妫涚弧鈧繝纰夌磿閸忔﹢宕洪敓鐘茬<婵犲﹤鍟粻娲⒒閸屾瑧顦﹂柟纰卞亜鐓ら柕濞炬櫅绾剧粯绻涢幋娆忕仼闁绘帒鐏氶妵鍕箳閸℃ぞ澹曟繝鐢靛Л閸嬫捇姊洪鈧粔鎾倿閸偁浜滈柟鍝勭Х閸忓矂鏌涢悢鍝ュ弨闁哄瞼鍠栧畷娆撳Χ閸℃浼�8闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閹冣挃闁硅櫕鎹囬垾鏃堝礃椤忎礁浜鹃柨婵嗙凹缁ㄥジ鏌熼惂鍝ョМ闁哄矉缍侀、姗€鎮欓幖顓燁棧闂備線娼уΛ娆戞暜閹烘缍栨繝闈涱儐閺呮煡鏌涘☉鍗炲妞ゃ儲鑹鹃埞鎴炲箠闁稿﹥顨嗛幈銊╂倻閽樺锛涢梺缁樺姉閸庛倝宕戠€n喗鐓熸俊顖濆吹濠€浠嬫煃瑜滈崗娑氭濮橆剦鍤曢柟缁㈠枛椤懘鏌嶉埡浣告殲闁绘繃鐗犲缁樼瑹閳ь剟鍩€椤掑倸浠滈柤娲诲灡閺呭爼骞嶉鍓э紲濡炪倖娲栧Λ娑㈠礆娴煎瓨鎳氶柡宥庣亹瑜版帗鏅查柛顐ゅ櫏娴犫晛顪冮妶鍡樷拹婵炶尙鍠庨~蹇撁洪鍛画闂佽顔栭崰妤呭箟婵傚憡鈷戦柤濮愬€曢弸鍌炴煕鎼达絾鏆鐐插暙椤粓鍩€椤掑嫬鏄ラ柨鐔哄Т缁€鍐┿亜韫囨挻锛旂紒杈ㄧ叀濮婄粯鎷呴搹鐟扮闂佽崵鍠嗛崹钘夌暦閹达箑绠荤紓浣贯缚閸橀亶姊洪棃娴ㄥ綊宕曢幎钘夋槬闁挎繂娲犻崑鎾斥枔閸喗鐏堝銈庡弮閺€杈ㄧ┍婵犲洤绠瑰ù锝呮憸閸樻悂姊虹粙鎸庢拱闁活収鍠氶懞杈ㄧ鐎n偀鎷绘繛杈剧到閹虫瑨銇愰幒鎴濈彉濡炪倖甯掗崐濠氭儗濞嗘挻鐓欓弶鍫熷劤閻︽粓鏌℃担绋库偓鍧楀蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閹冣挃闁硅櫕鎹囬垾鏃堝礃椤忎礁浜鹃柨婵嗙凹缁ㄥジ鏌熼惂鍝ョМ闁哄矉缍侀、姗€鎮欓幖顓燁棧闂備線娼уΛ娆戞暜閹烘缍栨繝闈涱儐閺呮煡鏌涘☉鍗炲妞ゃ儲鑹鹃埞鎴炲箠闁稿﹥顨嗛幈銊╂倻閽樺锛涢梺缁樺姉閸庛倝宕戠€n喗鐓熸俊顖濆吹濠€浠嬫煃瑜滈崗娑氭濮橆剦鍤曢柟缁㈠枛椤懘鏌eΟ鑽ゅ灩闁搞儯鍔庨崢閬嶆煟韫囨洖浠滃褌绮欓幃锟狀敍濮樿偐鍞甸柣鐔哥懃鐎氼厾绮堥埀顒勬⒑鐎圭媭娼愰柛銊ユ健閵嗕礁鈻庨幋鐘碉紲闂佽鍎虫晶搴g玻濡ゅ懏鈷掑ù锝呮啞閸熺偞銇勯鐐搭棦鐎规洘锕㈤弫鎰板幢濞嗗苯浜炬繛宸簼閸婂灚顨ラ悙鑼虎闁告梹纰嶇换娑㈡嚑椤掆偓閳诲牏鈧娲橀崹鍧楃嵁濮椻偓閹虫粓妫冨☉娆戔偓顓㈡⒒娴e憡鍟炴繛璇х畵瀹曟粌鈽夐姀鈩冩珫濠电偞鍨崹娲煕閹达附鐓曟繛鎴炃氶惇瀣箾閸喐绀€闁宠鍨块幃娆戞嫚瑜戦崥顐︽⒑鐠団€虫灆闁告濞婇妴浣割潩鐠鸿櫣鍔﹀銈嗗坊閸嬫捇鏌i敐鍥у幋鐎规洖銈稿鎾Ω閿旇姤鐝滄繝鐢靛О閸ㄧ厧鈻斿☉銏╂晞闁糕剝銇涢弸宥夋倶閻愮紟鎺楀绩娴犲鐓熸俊顖濇娴犳盯鏌¢崱蹇旀珔闁宠鍨块、娆撴嚍閵夈儱鏀俊銈囧Х閸嬫盯鏁冮妷銉殫闁告洦鍨扮粻娑欍亜閹烘垵浜扮紒閬嶄憾濮婄粯鎷呯粵瀣秷閻庤娲橀敃銏ゃ€佸鎰佹▌闂佸搫琚崝鎴炰繆閸洖骞㈤柡鍥╁Х閻i箖姊绘笟鈧ḿ褔鎮ч崱娆屽亾濮樼厧鐏︾€规洘顨呴悾婵嬪礋椤掑倸骞堟繝纰樻閸ㄥ磭鍒掗姘辨殾閻忕偟鍋撻崣蹇撯攽閻樺弶鍣烘い蹇曞█閺屽秷顧侀柛鎾寸懃閿曘垺娼忛妸锕€寮块梺姹囧灮鏋潻婵嬫⒑閸涘﹤濮﹀ù婊呭仧婢规洘绺介崨濠勫帗閻熸粍绮撳畷婊冾潩鏉堚晝鐣堕梺缁樻⒒閸樠囨倿閸偁浜滈柟鍝勬娴滄儳顪冮妶鍡樼┛缂傚秳绶氶悰顔芥償閵婏箑娈熼梺闈涱槶閸庢壆鑺辨繝姘拻濞达絼璀﹂弨浼存煕鐎n偄濮嶇€规洘鍨佃灒闁艰婢樺皬濠电姷鏁告慨鐢靛枈瀹ュ鐓曢柟杈鹃檮閻撴洟鏌熼柇锕€澧紒鐙欏洦鐓欐い鏍ㄦ皑婢э箓鏌$仦鍓р姇缂佺粯绻堝畷鎺楀Χ閸パ勫€梺璇叉唉椤煤閳哄啰绀婂〒姘e亾鐎规洘妞介崺鈧い鎺嶉檷娴滄粓鏌熼悜妯虹仴妞ゅ浚浜弻宥夋煥鐎n亞浼岄梺鍝勬湰缁嬫垿鍩為幋锕€骞㈡俊銈咃梗缁辨挻淇婇悙顏勨偓銈夊磻閹惧墎涓嶉柟鎹愵嚙閽冪喐绻涢幋娆忕仼缂侇偄绉归弻宥堫檨闁告挾鍠庨悾鐤亹閹烘垿鏁滃┑掳鍊曢崯顐ょ矈閿曞倹鈷戦柛娑橈工婵箓鏌涢悩宕囧ⅹ婵炴彃鐏濋埞鎴︽偐椤旇偐浼囧┑鐐差槹閻╊垶寮崘顔芥櫇闁稿本绋掑▍鏍р攽閻樿宸ラ柛鐔哄█瀵劍绂掔€n偆鍘介梺褰掑亰閸樼晫绱為幋锔界厽闊洢鍎抽悾鐢告煛鐏炶濮傜€殿喗娼欒灃濞达絽婀辫ぐ鍡涙⒑鐠囨煡鍙勬繛浣冲洤围闁归棿绀侀弸渚€鏌熼崜褏甯涢柡鍛倐閺屻劑鎮ら崒娑橆伓闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閹冣挃闁硅櫕鎹囬垾鏃堝礃椤忎礁浜鹃柨婵嗙凹缁ㄧ粯銇勯幒瀣仾闁靛洤瀚伴獮鍥敍濮f寧鎹囬弻鐔哥瑹閸喖顬堝銈庡亝缁挸鐣烽崡鐐嶆棃鍩€椤掑嫮宓佸┑鐘插绾句粙鏌涚仦鎹愬闁逞屽墰閹虫捇锝炲┑瀣╅柍杞拌兌閻ゅ懐绱撴担鍓插剱妞ゆ垶鐟╁畷銉р偓锝庡枟閻撴洘銇勯幇闈涗簼缂佽埖姘ㄧ槐鎾诲礃閳哄倻顦板┑顔硷龚濞咃綁骞忛悩璇茶摕闁靛鍠掗崑鎾澄旈崨顔惧幈濠碘槅鍨靛畷鐢告儗閹烘柡鍋撶憴鍕闁搞劌娼¢悰顔嘉熼懖鈺冿紲濠碘槅鍨抽崢褔鐛崼銉︹拻濞达絽鎲¢幆鍫熺箾鐏炲倸鐏茬€规洘绻勬禒锕傚礈瑜滃ú鎼佹⒑缂佹ê濮夐柛搴涘€濋幃锟犲Ψ閿斿墽顔曢梺鐟邦嚟閸嬬喖骞婇崨顔剧闁圭粯甯為幗鐘绘煙娓氬灝濡界紒缁樼箞瀹曟﹢鍩炴径姝屾闂傚倷娴囬鏍窗濮樿泛绀傛俊顖欒閸ゆ洟鏌ょ粙璺ㄤ粵闁稿海鍠栭弻鐔兼倷椤掍胶绋囬梺浼欑畳娴滎剛妲愰幘璇茬<婵﹩鍏橀崑鎾搭槹鎼淬埄鍋ㄩ梺璺ㄥ枔婵挳姊婚娑栦簻闁哄洦顨呮禍楣冩倵鐟欏嫭绀€缂傚秴锕ら悾閿嬬附缁嬪灝宓嗛梺缁樺姉閺佹悂寮抽锔解拻濞达綀濮ょ涵鍫曟煕閻樿櫕灏伴柟渚垮姂楠炴﹢顢欓懖鈺婃敤闂備浇顫夐崕鍏兼叏閵堝鍋傞煫鍥ㄧ〒閸欐捇鏌涢妷锝呭姎闁告柣鍊楅惀顏堝箚瑜庨崑銉╂煛鐏炲墽鈽夐摶锝夋煕韫囨挸鎮戞慨锝呯墕閳规垿顢欑涵宄板缂備緡鍣崹宕囧垝椤撱垺鍋勯柣鎾虫捣閸婄偤鎮峰⿰鍐i悗闈涘悑閹棃鏁愰崶鈺嬬闯濠电偠鎻徊浠嬪箹椤愶絿澧¢梻鍌欑劍閹爼宕濈仦缁撶細闁跨喓濮寸粻鏍归崗鍏煎剹闁轰礁锕﹂惀顏堝箯瀹€鍕懙閻庣偣鍊栧钘夘潖濞差亝鐒婚柣鎰蔼鐎氭澘顭胯椤曨參鍩€椤掍緡鍟忛柛鐘崇墵閳ワ箓鎮滈挊澶嬬€梺褰掑亰閸樿偐娆㈤悙缈犵箚妞ゆ牗绮庣敮娑欑箾閸涱厾效婵﹦绮幏鍛存惞閻熸壆顐奸梻浣规偠閸旀垵岣胯閸欏懘姊洪棃娑氬婵☆偅鐟╁畷锝堢疀閺冨倻顔曢梺鐟扮摠閻熴儵鎮橀鍫熺厓闂佸灝顑呴悘瀛樻叏婵犲啯銇濇い銏℃礋婵″爼宕ㄩ鍌涘礋闂傚倷绀侀崥瀣渻閸ф鍨傞梺顒€绉撮悿楣冩煕椤愶絾澶勯柡浣革躬閺屾盯骞樺Δ鈧幏鎴犳閹惰姤鐓熼幖杈剧磿閻n參鏌涙惔銊ゆ喚妤犵偛绻橀獮瀣攽閹邦剚娅婇梻渚€娼чˇ顓㈠磿閹惰棄姹查柛鈩冪⊕閻撱儲绻濋棃娑欘棡妞ゃ儲绮嶉妵鍕即閻旇櫣鐓傜紓浣介哺鐢偟妲愰幒鎳崇喖鎳栭埡鍐╂濠碉紕鍋戦崐銈夊磻閸涱垱宕查柛顐犲劘閳ь兛绀佽灃闁告侗鍘鹃敍婊堟⒑闂堟稓澧曢柟鍐茬箻瀵娊鍩¢崨顔规嫽闂佺ǹ鏈懝楣冨焵椤掆偓閸㈡煡婀侀梺鎼炲劀閳ь剟寮搁弽顓熺厸闁搞儯鍎遍悘鈺呮⒒閸屻倕鐏﹂柡灞诲姂瀵挳鎮欏ù瀣壕闁告縿鍎虫稉宥嗐亜閺嶎偄浠﹂柣鎾卞劦閺岋綁寮撮悙娴嬪亾閸︻厸鍋撳鐐3闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閹冣挃闁硅櫕鎹囬垾鏃堝礃椤忎礁浜鹃柨婵嗙凹缁ㄥジ鏌熼惂鍝ョМ闁哄矉缍侀、姗€鎮欓幖顓燁棧闂備線娼уΛ娆戞暜閹烘缍栨繝闈涱儐閺呮煡鏌涘☉鍗炲妞ゃ儲鑹鹃埞鎴炲箠闁稿﹥顨嗛幈銊╂倻閽樺锛涢梺缁樺姉閸庛倝宕戠€n喗鐓熸俊顖濆吹濠€浠嬫煃瑜滈崗娑氭濮橆剦鍤曢柟缁㈠枛椤懘鏌嶉埡浣告殲闁绘繃娲熷缁樻媴閽樺-鎾绘煥濮橆厹浜滈柨鏃囶嚙閺嬨倗绱掓潏銊︻棃鐎殿喗鎸虫慨鈧柍閿亾闁归绮换娑欐綇閸撗呅氬┑鐐叉嫅缁插潡寮灏栨闁靛骏绱曢崢閬嶆⒑閸濆嫬鏆婇柛瀣尰缁绘盯鎳犻鈧弸娑㈡煟濞戝崬娅嶇€殿喕绮欓、妯款槼闁哄懏绻堝娲濞戞艾顣哄┑鐐额嚋缁茶法鍒掗鐔风窞濠电姴瀛╃€靛矂姊洪棃娑氬婵☆偅绋掗弲鍫曟焼瀹ュ棛鍘遍柣搴秵閸撴瑦绂掗柆宥嗙厵妞ゆ洖妫涚弧鈧繝纰夌磿閸忔﹢宕洪敓鐘茬<婵犲﹤鍟粻娲⒒閸屾瑧顦﹂柟纰卞亜鐓ら柕濞炬櫅绾剧粯绻涢幋娆忕仼闁绘帒鐏氶妵鍕箳閸℃ぞ澹曟繝鐢靛Л閸嬫捇姊洪鈧粔鎾倿閸偁浜滈柟鍝勭Х閸忓矂鏌涢悢鍝ュ弨闁哄瞼鍠栧畷娆撳Χ閸℃浼�11闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鐐劤缂嶅﹪寮婚悢鍏尖拻閻庨潧澹婂Σ顔剧磼閹冣挃闁硅櫕鎹囬垾鏃堝礃椤忎礁浜鹃柨婵嗙凹缁ㄥジ鏌熼惂鍝ョМ闁哄矉缍侀、姗€鎮欓幖顓燁棧闂備線娼уΛ娆戞暜閹烘缍栨繝闈涱儐閺呮煡鏌涘☉鍗炲妞ゃ儲鑹鹃埞鎴炲箠闁稿﹥顨嗛幈銊╂倻閽樺锛涢梺缁樺姉閸庛倝宕戠€n喗鐓熸俊顖濆吹濠€浠嬫煃瑜滈崗娑氭濮橆剦鍤曢柟缁㈠枛椤懘鏌嶉埡浣告殲闁绘繃鐗犲缁樼瑹閳ь剟鍩€椤掑倸浠滈柤娲诲灡閺呭爼骞嶉鍓э紲濡炪倖娲栧Λ娑㈠礆娴煎瓨鎳氶柡宥庣亹瑜版帗鏅查柛顐ゅ櫏娴犫晛顪冮妶鍡樷拹婵炶尙鍠庨~蹇撁洪鍛画闂佽顔栭崰妤呭箟婵傚憡鈷戦柤濮愬€曢弸鍌炴煕鎼达絾鏆鐐插暙椤粓鍩€椤掑嫬鏄ラ柨鐔哄Т缁€鍐┿亜韫囨挻锛旂紒杈ㄧ叀濮婄粯鎷呴搹鐟扮闂佽崵鍠嗛崹钘夌暦閹达箑绠荤紓浣贯缚閸橀亶姊洪棃娴ㄥ綊宕曢幎钘夋槬闁挎繂娲犻崑鎾斥枔閸喗鐏堝銈庡弮閺€杈ㄧ┍婵犲洤绠瑰ù锝呮憸閸樻悂姊虹粙鎸庢拱闁活収鍠氶懞杈ㄧ鐎n偀鎷绘繛杈剧到閹虫瑨銇愰幒鎴濈彉濡炪倖甯掗崐濠氭儗濞嗘挻鐓欓弶鍫熷劤閻︽粓鏌℃担绋库偓鍧楀蓟閵娾晜鍋嗛柛灞剧☉椤忥拷
您现在的位置:佛教导航>> 五明研究>> 英文佛教>>正文内容

Embodied Soul. The Focus For Nursing praxis

       

发布时间:2009年04月18日
来源:不详   作者:Picard C
人关注  打印  转发  投稿


·期刊原文


Embodied Soul. The Focus For Nursing praxis

Picard C

J Holist Nurs

Vol.15 No. 1 Mar.1997 Pp.41-53

Copyright by J Holist Nurs


EMBODIED SOUL

The Focus for Nursing Praxis

This article explores the nature of embodied soul as a phenomenon of
concern to nursing. Examples of the body/soul debate from early Greek
philosophers to the present day are examined. Early writings on the subject
echo in medieval writings and in present-day knowledge of neuroscience and
physics, as well as in the writings of Merleau-Ponty. The author proposes
that nursing embrace the concept as it relates to Berry's patterns of
differentiation, subjectivity, and communion in the universe. These
patterns exist from the cellular to the cosmic level. It is through the
embodied soul that one engages in this process. The works of selected nurse
theorists are examined as they relate to the topic. Both the subject of the
client and of the nurse as embodied souls are addressed.

Behold, the body includes and is the meaning, the main concern,
and includes and is the soul;
Whoever you are, how superb and divine is your body
or any part of it! (Whitman, 1992, p. 17)

The phenomenon of the soul and its relationship to the body has been
written about by philosophers, theologians, mystics, and scientists over
the past 4 millennia. Nurses have also explored this phenomenon (Lane,
1987; Nagai-Jacobson & Burkhardt, 1989; Newman, 1994; Nightingale,
1860/1969; Parse, 1981; Picard, in press; Roach, 1992a; Rogers, 1970;
Vaillot, 1970; Watson, 1985). The debate on this relationship continues to
this day.

HISTORICAL ELEMENTS OF EMBODIED SOUL

Embodied Soul/No Soul: Old Testament and Buddhist Traditions

In pre-Hellenic times, beliefs in both Western and Eastern religious and
philosophical traditions described embodied soul as the nature of person.
The Hebrew word nepes means soul and also the human person as he or she
begins to live (Tresmontant, 1960). Soul as consciousness is another
element of nepes. According to Tresmontant, the Hebrews understood that
"soul is the man. Indeed, we should not say man has a soul but that he is a
soul; nor consequently that he has a body, but that he is a body" (p. 94).
This sense of integrality of person as embodied soul and form of
consciousness is also found in Buddhism, although some writings on the
subject might disagree. Buddha's gospel includes a dialogue regarding the
nature of soul (Buddha, trans. 1915). When asked about the immortal nature
of the soul, Buddha denied it. But in a reading of the passage, the idea of
soul as embodied consciousness, unique to each person, can be understood.
Buddha did not believe in the soul as a separate entity but stated that "he
who understands by (the word) soul mind, and says that mind exists, teaches
the truth which leads to clearness and enlightenment" (Buddha, 1915, p.
151). This aspect of mind enabled the Buddha to appreciate the sense of
communion with the world and the absurdity of thinking of each sell or
soul, as distinct and unengaged with the universe. For Buddha, the notion
of immortal soul as a unique expression of a person's self was inaccurate.
Buddha himself can be interpreted as embodied soul as, in deep meditation,
he became aware of the flux of all things in the world, including persons.
Buddha was able to have a direct experience of this flow between self and
world through a heightened awareness of the subtle vibrations both within
and around his body (Spretnack, 1991).

Greek Philosophers: Heraclitus, Plato, Aristotle

Heraclitus (trans. 1979), a pre-Socratic philosopher, described soul in
terms of flow in the universe. Embodied soul as person exists in sameness
despite constant shifts in the stability of the world. Heraclitus believed
that the soul has the possibilities of expansion: "To the soul belongs a
report that increases itself" (trans. 1979, p. 75). The soulfulness of a
person is expansive and always flowing. Depth as a quality of both embodied
and world soul was also expressed by Heraclitus. He believed one could
never find the limits of soul "no matter how hard one tries, so deep is its
report" (trans. 1979, p. 45).

This concept of flow is also found in the writings of Plato, who described
the changing nature of both body and soul (Plato, trans. 1927/1974). Plato
believed in an immortal soul, separate from the body, that is self-moving.
Soul is the moving principle of the body. It is a formless intangible
essence, known only to mind. He also believed in a world soul, or the soul
in its totality, which is the mover of inanimate things (Plato, trans.
1927/1974). He associates virtues of beauty; wisdom, and goodness with the
divine soul, which struggles with the mortal aspects in his image of the
horses and charioteer. His idea of the soul beholding absolute truth,
beauty, and love is the guiding principle behind immortality for perfect
souls and the need for reincarnation of those less perfect.

Aristotle described soul as the "essential whatness," or ousia, of a thing,
the definitive meaning, and its essential character. The body is the
material condition, but its activities are soulful (Aristotle, trans.
1960). Soul is unique to body and the formative, particular force in
defining that being. Aristotle argued that the body is ensouled as a
particular organic totality and disagreed with Plato that a soul could
transmigrate to another body. For Aristotle, body/soul was a special
relationship of two interagents.

With the Platonic and Aristotelian traditions in Greek thought, it is
understandable that in Greek translations of the Hebrew Bible, nepes (soul)
was translated into two different terms, pneuma and psyche. According to
Hillman (1975), the Greek spirit, or pneuma, is a masculine aspect
associated with light, speed, lifting, or soaring. Soul, or psyche, is a
feminine principle more closely linked to earth and the body; with
characteristics of depth and darkness. The Hebrew belief in embodied soul
continues to be a part of the New Testament but primarily in the gospels
(Hillman, 1975). In the Christian tradition, by the 8th century; embodied
soul as an integral aspect of person is eliminated and spirit, or pneuma,
is identified in its place (Bilaniuk, 1967). Although soul becomes part of
the church's teachings again, its meaning is changed. The philosophical
concept of body and soul as connected but separate is established.

Medieval Mystics

In the Middle Ages, the Christian church was the predominant spiritual
belief system of European people. The concept of body and soul as joined
but separate was a strongly held belief. However, a movement within the
church emerged that began with Hildegard of Bingen and continued with the
Rhineland mystics, such as Meister Eckhardt (Fox, 1988). These religious
leaders believed in the capacity of persons to have a direct experience of
the Divine and embraced a belief in embodied soul that celebrated
embodiment as a cause of joy and revelation in the mysteries of creation.
Hildegard of Bingen wrote on the subject of viriditas, or greening power
(Fox, 1985). Viriditas is the capacity of the Divine to nourish one's soul.
Hildegard drew her spiritual imagery from the body and the surrounding
world to express this concept. For Hildegard, "the soul is the freshness of
the flesh, for the body grows and thrives through it just as the earth
becomes fruitful with moisture" (see Fox, 1985, p. 32). This integrality of
embodied soul is also found in the writings of Meister Eckhart, who stated,
"You should consider how it is that/the body is more in the soul/than the
soul is in the body" (cited in Fox, 1983, p. 105).

Descartes's Legacy: Soul as Disembodied

Whether Descartes meant for his philosophy to support the dualistic
framework that was to rule science for 200 years is debatable (Spicker,
1970). In the meditations of Descartes, body and soul are perceived as
separate and distinct substances. The body is mortal, divisible, and
mechanical; and the soul is immortal and indivisible and contains the
intellect. Body and soul are mutually exclusive in their properties
(Descartes, 1641/1993). Descartes believed that thought made us distinctly
human and was the essence of our being. There is no wisdom of the body in
his philosophy. Descartes believed the body acted on the soul and that the
soul had influence on the body, but his imagery of the body as machine, and
its extension to nature as soulless and in need of control, became a
metaphor that influenced the consciousness of science and technology until
the middle of this century. Science could investigate the body and focus on
technology, but the soul became the domain of the church.

EVERYTHING OLD IS NEW AGAIN: TWENTIETH CENTURY'S THOUGHT ON EMBODIED SOUL

Science, Once Blind, Can See: Physics, Cell Biology, and Neuroscience

Scientific theories in the 20th century reflect what was known by Buddha,
Heraclitus, and other ancients. In physics, the principles of unity,
complexity, and subjectivity as explored by Einstein and others result in
an understanding that matter and energy are different manifestations of the
same thing (Capra, 1983). The observer in the world has an effect on the
observed, playing a role in a unified order that has many possibilities of
expression. For example, the decision to measure light as a particle or a
wave has an effect on its expression in reality. More recently, Bohm's
concept of "implicate" order, or an underlying pattern of the universe and
our observations of explicit order as visible or measurable manifestations
of that order, echo older wisdom traditions (Bohm, 1980).

Another old and new way to approach the nature of the universe is the idea
of consciousness. Consciousness exists at the subatomic level in the sense
of interrelationship of particles and at higher levels expressed by
persons. Body wisdom, or the wisdom of cells responding to nutrients, or
organ systems responding to a threat, or a person's ability to solve
problems and to create are all manifestations of consciousness. DiMasio
(1994), a neurologist, studied emotion and reason, describing the richness
of the interrelationship of aspects of mind and body as they are expressed
in the person. DiMasio believes that embodiment is an essential way of
knowing person: "It is just that soul and spirit, with all their dignity
and human scale, are now complex and unique states of the organism" (1994,
p. 244). If person is a consciousness, embodied soul is a clear term to
describe lived experience as embodied soul. The concept of expanding
universe and expanding consciousness can be perceived as two expressions of
the capacity of an ensouled world.

Merleau-Ponty's philosophy emphasizes the embodiment of subject in the
world. The idea of unity of conscious life rests on body as unity
(Merleau-Ponty, 1962). Persons cannot be other than engaged in this world
and are part of consciousness. Merleau-Ponty described person as
body/subject, with self not separate from body. For him, human beings are
embodied selves living through the world. Merleau-Ponty speaks of soul
essential to embodied experience: "The significance of a thing inhabits
that thing as the soul inhabits the body; it is not behind appearances"
(Merleau-Ponty; 1962, p. 319). Embodiment refers to meanings, expectations,
styles, and habits expressed and experienced by the body/self. Rawlinson
(1982) described the body as a system of possibility rather than a simple
physical entity. Body/subject is lived through in movements, desires,
attentions, and gestures.

Hillman (1975), a psychologist, believes much of our 20th century distress
comes from a lack of attention to soul and its relation to embodied
experience. He conceives of soul as perspective instead of substance and
believes metaphor, images, and contemplation are what nourish soulfulness.

Harre (1991) discusses embodiment as an aspect of personhood. Using the
example of preparation for surgery as a ritual of separation of personhood
from body, Harre argues that body and person might be engaged separately.
For the physician, the above scenario may be true; however, for the nurse,
the person is embodied soul, whether conscious or not.

In the early 1960s, as part of the societal turmoil, a challenge was made
to established religions in terms of the importance of spiritual beliefs,
including soul. An erosion of faith in religious and political structures,
challenges to established values and mores related to sexuality and the
role of women, the death of national leaders, war, and environmental
problems all contributed to this crisis. What emerged at the end of that
decade was a renewal in hope for soul expressed in the ecology movement,
embracing the needs of the planet and person's role in relationship to it.
As persons looked to relationships to search for embodied soul, they also
began to explore older wisdom traditions of Eastern and Native American
spirituality. Feminists began to reclaim the power of being in relationship
as a value to be explored not only in the private spheres of life but in
science and public policy areas as well (Keller, 1983). Feminists also
reclaimed the body as a source of knowing, beginning the self-help
movement. Fox (1988) and Berry (1988), two theologians, wrote on the wonder
and joyful creativity of a spirituality which honors the soul of the
individual and of the cosmos. Berry integrated knowledge from science and
older wisdom traditions and identified three guiding principles of the
earth: differentiation, subjectivity, and communion. These concepts were
included in writings in nursing, with differentiation reflected in the
uniqueness of each patient, subjectivity in the lived experience of the
individual, and communion in the need for relationship and connection
(Benner & Wrubel, 1989; Gadow, 1990; Kesselring, 1990; Lane, 1987; Lindsey,
1995; Moch, 1990; Nagai-Jacobson, 1989; Newman, 1994; Picard, in press;
Roach, 1992a; Rogers, 1970; Watson, 1985). Berry credited the scientific
community with giving mankind an appreciation of the universe. Although
science could continually add to the knowledge of how the universe works,
its purpose remained ineffable.

Embodied soul is the human form of possibility in all unique expressions.
The experience of being in the world is by its nature subjective, and the
principle of soulfulness is what connects us to all aspects of our
planetary life. Meeting the world as a besouled and engaging person
provides one with a deeply connected sense of communion.

Nursing's Emergence as Being and Engaging With Embodied Soul

Watson (1985) referred to soul as the geist, the spirit and an essential
core aspect of person. She acknowledged the quality of mystery in her
discussion of soul and reflected on a sense of higher consciousness and
transcendence of the body/self as immortal. Watson presented soul as the
first in her basic beliefs about human life and identified a disturbance in
inner soul as a cause of illness. In Watson's theory, nurses care for
persons in the integrality of their three spheres of being as
body/mind/soul (Watson, 1985).

Newman (1994) describes consciousness as the essence of all matter. This
conceptualization of consciousness includes consciousness as existing from
the basic molecular to the cognitive and nonlocal forms of consciousness.
One example of this consciousness is that of the immune system.
Consciousness here is not only a state of being but a potential as well.
Newman's theory that consciousness is reflected in movement is parallel to
Plato's self-moving principle of the soul. She believes that care of the
soul, attending to embodied consciousness, is the moral imperative of
nursing (Newman, 1994). Newman's challenge to nursing to embrace a
collaborative model of caring speaks to Berry's principles: the need for
unconditional love as manifested in sensitivity to self (subjectivity),
attention to others (communion), and creativity (differentiation).

Roach (1992b) believes nursing must be anchored by metaphysics and
discusses unity as a metaphysical concept for nursing. "In our diverse
reflections, there is a thread of unity in the awareness of the mysterious,
the sacred, the specialness or uniqueness of the human being" (Roach,
1992b, p. 40). Roach conceives of nursing as person in relation, which she
also identifies as human community. Roach goes further by identifying the
caring artistic paradigm as the root metaphor for nursing and the need to
reclaim a sense of awe before the mystery of creation (Roach, 1995). She
conceives of embodied soul as a unity, whereby the person is "the meeting
point of fusion into one nature of the visible world of the today and the
invisible world of the spiritual soul" (Roach, 1992a, p. 22).

Current Nursing Research on Embodiment

Gadow (1980) described the change in the relationship of self to body
during illness and aging. In this process, the sense of integrality of
body/self as a unity is disrupted. There is potential in this crisis to
move from an experience of body as object, not self, to one of
body/subject, a fuller and richer experience of self as embodied person.
This change in consciousness of body/self relationship is the opportunity
of illness.

Benner and Wrubel (1989) examine embodiment in their study of stress and
coping, citing the importance of this integrated way of understanding
person. Their exploration of embodied intelligence has importance both for
nurses and for their patients in designing strategies for care. For
example, nurses can design interventions that support recovering bodily
capacities once known but lost through injury or illness.

Doolittle (1994), in a study of 13 stroke survivors, examined the
experience of recovery, with particular attention paid to the importance of
embodied experience. Doolittle described the importance of the ability of
the survivors to engage in social activities and routines that required
bodily engagement. The capacity to perform these activities was more
important to subjects than an overall improvement in functional status.

In a study examining the meaning of comfort to 36 patients with serious
illness, surgery, or trauma, Morse, Bottorff, and Hutchinson (1995) found
that one of the most distressing aspects of the illness experience related
to change in their embodied experience. The subjects in this study
described their feelings in terms of suffering, pain, and loss of trust or
control over their bodies. Comfort, according to the authors, is more
notable by its absence in the embodied experiences of discomfort (Morse et
al., 1995). These researchers defined comfort as a state of integration and
health of body, and believe the examination of ways of restoring this
integration is a main goal of nursing. In a study of living with breast
cancer, Moch (1990) identified lack of control over one's body while in
treatment for breast cancer and the uncertainty over the possibility of
recurrence as sources of distress for subjects. A theme that emerged from
the research was of new perspectives on life as a result of the illness
experience, including a heightened sense of connectedness to others and
time spent in self-reflection and self-care. Again, Berry's (1988)
principles are present in these findings of nurse researchers. om surgery;
described respondents' healing as a process of active participation,
achievement of balance, and evolution beyond their presurgical state of
being. Each aspect of the process involved a heightened body experience
whereby subjects moved from feeling out of control and disconnected in
mind/body to an reintegration at a higher level (Criddle, 1992). Healing
from chronic illness has similar dimensions. As reported by Lindsey (1995)
in a study of patients' experiences healing from chronic illness and
disability, subjects described moving through a process of expanding
consciousness and integration of self into wholeness of mind/body/spirit.
Subjects reported that the healing modalities most helpful were those that
worked on the body or those that focused on mind, emotions, and spirit.
Although the study was limited in its generalizability due to the small
number of subjects, the participants called for health care providers to
attend to wholeness of experience. Further research on the role nurses can
play in this process is also needed. Price (1993) examined the phenomenon
of body listening, based on lived body experience of illness, and defined
the body paradigm, an explanatory model of subjects' definitions of
themselves as embodied persons. The paradigm includes awareness of energy
level, circadian rhythms, past and present physical health and illness
experiences, and in-the-moment conscious awareness.

Kesselring (1990) described the embodied experiences of 18 women undergoing
chemotherapy for breast cancer The experience of embodiment described by
the subjects had three dimensions: body as shaper of the self and one's
world, body as an identity encountering medical interventions, and body as
a conceptual entity (Kesselring, 1990). Knowledge about the body on the
conceptual level was not adequate to help these women to cope with their
treatments and illness. The altered reality of being unable to perform
basic, ordinary taken-for-granted activities and functions as embodied self
created the most suffering and feelings of vulnerability in the subjects.
The author recommended the inclusion of embodied soul in nursing's
conceptual models (Kesselring, 1990).

As the above research indicates, there is a need for nurses to acknowledge
the person as embodied soul, as one whose experiences are more than a sum
of biopsychosocial dimensions and who has embodied wisdom and knowledge
from his or her unique experience of being in the world. Kesselring's
(1990) subjects never once mentioned body image, a construct that has
received considerable attention in nursing. They did, however, spend a
great deal of time describing the embodied experience of living through
chemotherapy just as Doolittle's (1994) subjects described living through
recovery from stroke.

THE FUTURE OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE AND EMBODIED SOUL

What are the implications of such a concept taking hold in the center of
the debate for the future of nursing? The concept of embodied soul implies
a sense of reverence in the culture that the concept of consciousness does
not. Soul is rooted in a deep spiritual tradition crossing millennia and
cultures. Moore (1992) reflects that there is no understanding of the soul
but a need for its contemplation and nurturance. In this postmodern age,
there is a need for reclaiming a sense of wonder about the nature of the
world. Often, it is the artist who can best express such an idea.

Embodied soul is the mystery, an expression of the capacity for growth and
expansion, with the need for nurturance. Nurses need to appreciate this
mystery as well as conduct research into what will help those who need our
care. As Gadow (1990) states, the concern for embodiment is critical in our
care delivery systems. Without honoring the soulful experience of
patienthood, the person is left in a disengaged, vulnerable, potentially
suffering place. Cassell (1992) concurs that suffering involves a lack of
meaning and a disconnectedness. The hazards are great in our health care
system for dishonoring embodied soul. The value placed on efficiency and
technological solutions to health problems is reflected in the amount of
time given to care for patients. Units of care are factored on activities
to be performed and not the need for interaction with person.

As a way to honor embodied soul, nurses can begin to reflect on symptoms
and illness as body parables (Spretnack, 1991), expressing dimensions of
embodied epistemology that value the subjectivity of both the nurse and
patient. Nurses can experience themselves as embodied souls engaged in
mutual creative processes with those cared for and appreciate the need to
honor and care for self as well as other. Nursing practice and research can
be approached as a form of extrovert meditation (Fox, 1979). Extrovert
meditation is a "centering by way of creating" (Fox, 1979, p. 132). The
focus is the soulfulness of engagement as communion, at whatever level of
care the person needs, be it a wound-dressing change for a person in coma
or a dialogue about the loss of a child. With this orientation to practice,
education, and research, nurses can honor the reverence of each unique
human life in a new way, opening up to the creative potential inherent in
all activity. This is an essential aspect of compassion and care for
embodied souls.

To explore the concept of embodied soul with patients, areas fruitful for
research include phenomenological studies of the lived experience of
healing relationships. What makes the difference for patients? What do they
experience as healing? How can nurse researchers, leaders, and managers
incorporate supports for nurses to nourish themselves as embodied souls?
What happens if nurses incorporate time for self-reflection and self-care
as a priority? What is the embodied experience of caring for patients?

Embodied soul as a way of thinking of person holds rich promise for nursing
theory and research. By placing high value on meaning, embodiment,
subjectivity, differentiation, and communion, nurses can influence their
own experience of being in the world and that of those for whom they care.

REFERENCES

Benner, P., & Wrubel, J. (1989). The primacy of caring. Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.

Berry, T. (1988). A dream of the earth. San Francisco: Sierra.

Bilaniuk, P. (1967). Theology of the human soul. In The new Catholic
encyclopedia (Vol. 13, pp. 462-464). Washington, DC: Catholic University
Press.

Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and implicate order. New York: Ark.

Capra, E (1983). The Tao of physics. Boston: New Science Library.

Cassell, E. (1992). The nature of suffering: physical, psychological,
social and spiritual aspects. In E Stark & J. McGovern (Eds.), The hidden
dimension of illness: Human suffering (pp. 1-10). New York: National League
for Nursing.

Criddle, L. (1992). Healing from surgery: A phenomenological study. Image,
25, 1993.

Descartes, R. (1993). Meditations on the first philosophy (D. A. Cress,
Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published 1641)

DiMasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the brain. New
York: Avon.

Doolittle, N. (1994). A clinical ethnography of stroke recovery. In P.
Benner (Ed.), Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring and ethics in
health and illness (pp. 211-223). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Fox, M. (1979). A spirituality named compassion. New York: Harper & Row.

Fox, M. (1983). Meditations with Meister Eckhart. Santa Fe, NM: Bear.

Fox, M. (1985). Illuminations of Hildegard of Bingen. Santa Fe, NM: Bear.

Fox, M. (1988). The coming of the cosmic Christ. New York: Harper & Row.
Gadow, S. (1980). Body and self: A dialectic. Journal of Medicine and
Philosophy, 5, 172-185.

Gadow, S. (1990, April). Beyond dualism: The dialectic of caring and
knowing. Paper presented at the conference on Caring and the Compassionate
Healer: A Call to Consciousness, Houston, TX.

Harre, R. (1991). Physical being. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Hillman, J. (1975). Re-visioning psychology. New York: Harper & Row.

Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism. New York: Freeman.

Kesselring, A. (1990). The experienced body, when taken for grantedness
falters: A phenomenological study of living with breast cancer. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation. University of California, San Francisco.

Lane, J. (1987). Care of the human spirit. Journal of Professional Nursing,
3, 332-337.

Lindsey, E. (1995). The gift of healing in chronic illness/disability.
Journal of Holistic Nursing, 13, 287-305.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. London:
Routledge Kegan Paul.

Moch, S. (1990). Health within the experience of breast cancer. Journal of
Advanced Nursing, 15, 1426-1435.

Moore, T. (1992). The care of the soul. New York: Harper Perennial.

Morse, J., Bottorff, J., & Hutchinson, S. (1995). The paradox of comfort.
Nursing Research, 44, 14-19.

Nagai-Jacobson, M., & Burkhardt, M. (1989). Spirituality: Cornerstone of
nursing practice. Advances in Nursing Science, 3, 18-26.

Newman, M. (1994). Health as expanding consciousness. New York: National
League for Nursing.

Nightingale, F. (1969). Notes on nursing: What it is and what it is not.
New York: Dover (Original work published 1860)

Parse, R. (1981). Man-living-health: A theory of nursing. New York: John
Wiley.

Picard, C. (in press). Walk in beauty: Aesthetics, caring and spirituality.
In S. Roach (Ed.), From the heart: The convergence of caring and
spirituality. New York: Paulist.

Price, M. (1993). Exploration of body listening: Health and physical
self-awareness in chronic illness. Advances in Nursing Science, 15, 37-52.

Rawlinson, M. (1982). Medicine's discourse and the practice of medicine. In
V. Kestenbaum (Ed.), The humanity of the ill (pp. 69-85). Knoxville:
University of Tennessee.

Roach, S.S. (1992a). The human act of caring. Ottawa: Canadian Hospital
Association.

Roach, S.S. (1992b). The aim of philosophical inquiry in nursing: Unity or
diversity of thought? In J. Kikuchi & H. Simmons (Eds.), Philosophic
inquiry in nursing (pp. 38-44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Roach, S.S. (1995). The dominant paradigm of the modem world. In A. Boykin
(Ed.), Power, politics and public policy: A matter of caring (pp. 3-10).
New York: National League for Nursing.

Rogers, M. (1970). An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing.
Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

Spicker, S. (Ed.). (1970). The philosophy of the body. Chicago: Quadrangle.

Spretnack, C. (1991). States of grace: Recovery of meaning in the
postmodern age. San Francisco: Harper.

Tresmontant, C. (1960). A study of Hebrew thought. New York: Desclee.

Vaillot, S. M. (1970). The spiritual factors of nursing. Journal of
Practical Nursing, 20, 30-31.

Watson, J. (1985). Nursing: Human science and human care. Norwalk, CT:
Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Whitman, W. (1992). Leaves of grass. New York: New Paperback Book Club.

~~~~~~~~

By Carol Picard, M.S.C.S., R.N. Fitchburg State College

Carol Picard, M.S., C.S., R.N., is an associate professor at Fitchburg
State College in Lunenburg, Massachusetts, and a doctoral student at Boston
College School of Nursing. Two of her recent publications are "Images of
Caring in Nursing and Dance" in the Journal of Holistic Nursing and "Walk
in Beauty: Aesthetics, Caring and Spirituality" in From the Heart: The
Convergence of Caring and Spirituality. Her research interests include
caring and the arts, as well as international nursing collaboration.
-------------------

没有相关内容

欢迎投稿:lianxiwo@fjdh.cn


            在线投稿

------------------------------ 权 益 申 明 -----------------------------
1.所有在佛教导航转载的第三方来源稿件,均符合国家相关法律/政策、各级佛教主管部门规定以及和谐社会公序良俗,除了注明其来源和原始作者外,佛教导航会高度重视和尊重其原始来源的知识产权和著作权诉求。但是,佛教导航不对其关键事实的真实性负责,读者如有疑问请自行核实。另外,佛教导航对其观点的正确性持有审慎和保留态度,同时欢迎读者对第三方来源稿件的观点正确性提出批评;
2.佛教导航欢迎广大读者踊跃投稿,佛教导航将优先发布高质量的稿件,如果有必要,在不破坏关键事实和中心思想的前提下,佛教导航将会对原始稿件做适当润色和修饰,并主动联系作者确认修改稿后,才会正式发布。如果作者希望披露自己的联系方式和个人简单背景资料,佛教导航会尽量满足您的需求;
3.文章来源注明“佛教导航”的文章,为本站编辑组原创文章,其版权归佛教导航所有。欢迎非营利性电子刊物、网站转载,但须清楚注明来源“佛教导航”或作者“佛教导航”。